Test one workload before you move it.
Your current route vs. one lower-cost route, on your own data, one week. Cost, quality, data boundary, exactly where it breaks, and a straight verdict — move, split, keep protected, or measure first. $9,500, fixed.
One workload. One week. No production traffic.
You have a high-volume workload and a lower-cost route that looks plausible. The risk goes beyond the bill: quality, customer harm, review burden, and whether sensitive prompts, corrections, or customer context should cross that route. We find that before you move anything.
How a workload becomes a verdict
- your data
- current vs. lower-cost
- cost · quality · boundary · what breaks
- verdict
What you get back
- move
- split the route
- keep protected
- measure first
The verdict is often keep protected or measure first. That's fine — you paid to know, not to be sold a migration.
Start with what you already have
Built for AI teams that have already tested cheaper inference and need a decision they own, not a vendor benchmark or consultant recommendation.
Bring one workload and whatever you've got — your logs, current outputs, a rough sense of "good enough." We'll tell you what else we need, or whether you're not ready to move this yet and what to measure first. We also mark the information boundary: what can leave your perimeter, what should stay local, and which prompts, corrections, hidden evals, or customer-specific workflows should stay protected. That answer alone can save you a bad cutover. No new instrumentation to begin, no production traffic, nothing sensitive before we've scoped it on a call.
Sample verdict
Synthetic sample, computed by our runner — the shape of what you receive.
Verdict: SPLIT. Move the clean digital invoices to the lower-cost route; keep scans, credit memos, VAT, and multi-page line items on the protected route.
| Cost per invoice | Current | Lower-cost |
|---|---|---|
| per item | $0.031 | $0.006 |
The catch the test caught: on credit memos, the lower-cost route flipped the sign — a −$1,240 credit became +$1,240. Silent, and exactly why that slice stays protected.
Before you ask
Why can't my team just do this?
They can. The question is whether they'll run a clean, controlled comparison this month while shipping everything else. We do only this, in a week, with a number at the end.
Are you competing with Modal, Fireworks, the neoclouds?
No. They run your workload. We're the check you run before you move it onto one of them. When the answer is move, you move it to them.
Is this benchmarking?
No. A benchmark ranks models. This answers one routing decision for one of your workloads, on your data, and ends in an action.
Will quality drop if we move?
That's what we measure. Sometimes the issue is quality; sometimes it is review burden, data path, retention, or IP exposure. The verdict keeps that slice protected.
Do we have to hand over sensitive data?
No. We start from what you already have, redacted, and scope exactly what's needed on a call first. If prompts, hidden evals, corrections, or customer context should stay local, the decision file names that boundary.
What if the answer is don't move?
Then you saved the cutover and the cleanup. You paid to know.
What this is not
Not a tool, not monitoring, not a dashboard, not a migration, not a model leaderboard. We test one decision and hand back a verdict.
Price: $9,500, fixed. One workload. One week.
Is there one high-volume workload where your current route may be doing work a lower-cost route could handle?